CT Cadaveric dataset for Radiomics features stability assessment in lumbar vertebrae.

Radiomics features (RFs) studies have showed limitations in the reproducibility of RFs in different acquisition settings. To date, reproducibility studies using CT images mainly rely on phantoms, due to the harness of patient exposure to X-rays. The provided CadAIver dataset has the aims of evaluating how CT scanner parameters effect radiomics features on cadaveric donor. The dataset comprises 112 unique CT acquisitions of a cadaveric truck acquired on 3 different CT scanners varying KV, mA, field-of-view, and reconstruction kernel settings. Technical validation of the CadAIver dataset comprises a comprehensive univariate and multivariate GLM approach to assess stability of each RFs extracted from lumbar vertebrae. The complete dataset is publicly available to be applied for future research in the RFs field, and could foster the creation of a collaborative open CT image database to increase the sample size, the range of available scanners, and the available body districts.

Fusion Length Requiring Spinopelvic Fixation in Lumbosacral Fusion with Anterior Column Support at L5-S1: Assessment of Fusion Status Using Computed Tomography.

Background: The lumbosacral (LS) junction has a higher nonunion rate than other lumbar segments, especially in long-level fusion. Nonunion at L5-S1 would result in low back pain, spinal imbalance, and poor surgical outcomes. Although anterior column support at L5-S1 has been recommended to prevent nonunion in long-level LS fusion, fusion length requiring additional spinopelvic fixation (SPF) in LS fusion with anterior column support at L5-S1 has not been evaluated thoroughly. This study aimed to determine the number of fused levels requiring SPF in LS fusion with anterior column support at L5-S1 by assessing the interbody fusion status using computed tomography (CT) depending on the fusion length. Methods: Patients who underwent instrumented LS fusion with L5-S1 interbody fusion without additional augmentation and CT > 1 year postoperatively were included. The fusion rates were assessed based on the number of fused segments. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the L5-S1 interbody fusion status: those with union vs. those with nonunion. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for LS junctional nonunion. Results: Fusion rates of L5-S1 interbody fusion were 94.9%, 90.3%, 80.0%, 50.0%, 52.6%, and 43.5% for fusion of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and ≥ 6 levels, respectively. The number of spinal levels fused ≥ 4 (p < 0.001), low preoperative bone mineral density (BMD; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.667; p = 0.035), and postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (aOR, 1.034; p = 0.040) were identified as significant risk factors for nonunion of L5-S1 interbody fusion according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Exhibiting ≥ 4 fused spinal levels, low preoperative BMD, and large postoperative PI-LL mismatch were identified as independent risk factors for nonunion of anterior column support at L5-S1 in LS fusion without additional fixation. Therefore, SPF should be considered in LS fusion extending to or above L2 to prevent LS junctional nonunion.

Preliminary data on artificial intelligence tool in magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine using radiologist evaluation as a gold standard. METHODS: Patients with degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine, evaluated with MRI study, were enrolled in a retrospective study approved by local ethical committee. A comprehensive software solution (CoLumbo; SmartSoft Ltd., Varna, Bulgaria) designed to label the segments of the lumbar spine and to detect a broad spectrum of degenerative pathologies based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed, utilizing an automatic segmentation. The AI tool efficacy was compared to data obtained by a senior neuroradiologist that employed a semiquantitative score. Chi-square test was used to assess the differences among groups, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated between the grading assigned by radiologist and the grading obtained by software. Moreover, agreement was assessed between the value assigned by radiologist and software. RESULTS: Ninety patients (58 men; 32 women) affected with degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine and aged from 60 to 81 years (mean 66 years) were analyzed. Significant correlations were observed between grading assigned by radiologist and the grading obtained by software for each localization. However, only when the localization was L2-L3, there was a good correlation with a coefficient value of 0.72. The best agreements were obtained in case of L1-L2 and L2-L3 localizations and were, respectively, of 81.1% and 72.2%. The lowest agreement of 51.1% was detected in case of L4-L5 locations. With regard canal stenosis and compression, the highest agreement was obtained for identification of in L5-S1 localization. CONCLUSIONS: AI solution represents an efficacy and useful toll degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine to improve radiologist workflow.

Vertebral fracture severity assessment on anteroposterior radiographs with a new semi-quantitative technique.

We developed a new tool to assess the severity of osteoporotic vertebral fracture using radiographs of the spine. Our technique can be used in patient care by helping to stratify patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures into appropriate treatment pathways. It can also be used for research purposes. PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to propose a semi-quantitative (SQ) grading scheme for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. METHODS: On AP radiographs, the vertebrae are divided into right and left halves, which are graded (A) vertical rectangle, (B) square, (C) traverse rectangle, and (D) trapezoid; whole vertebrae are graded (E) transverse band or (F) bow-tie. Type A and B were compared with normal and Genant SQ grade 1 OVF, Type C and D with grade 2 OVF, and Type E and F with grade 3 OVF. Spine AP radiographs and lateral radiographs of 50 females were assessed by AP radiographs SQ grading. After training, an experienced board-certified radiologist and a radiology trainee assessed the 50 AP radiographs. RESULTS: The height-to-width ratio of the half vertebrae varied 1.32-1.48. On lateral radiographs, 84 vertebrae of the 50 patients had OVFs (38 grade 1, 24 grade 2, and 22 grade 3). On AP radiographs, the radiologist correctly assigned 84.2%, 91.7%, and 77.2% and the trainee correctly assigned 68.4%, 79.2%, and 81.8% of grade 1, 2, and 3 OVFs, respectively. Compared with lateral radiographs, the radiologist had a weighted Kappa of 0.944 including normal vertebrae and 0.883 not including normal vertebrae, while the corresponding Kappa values for the trainee were 0.891 and 0.830, respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a new semi-quantitative grading system for vertebral fracture severity assessment on AP spine radiographs.

Correlations among Cervical, Thoracic, and lumbar Hounsfield Unit measurements for assessment of bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: Bone mineral density assessment using Hounsfield Unit (HU) currently depends upon the availability of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the associations among HU measurements of the cervical (CHU), thoracic (THU), and lumbar (LHU) spine. The secondary aim of this study was to analyze the influence of patient demographic and anthropometric characteristics on HU measurements. METHODS: Radiographic records of 165 patients who underwent CT of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were retrieved. The CHU, THU, and LHU were calculated by obtaining the mean signal intensity from the medullary portions of C3-C7, T8-T12, and L1-L4 vertebral bodies. RESULTS: Mean CHU, THU, and LHU values were 266.26 ± 88.69, 165.57 ± 55.06, and 166.45 ± 51.38. Significant differences of 100.69, 99.81, and 0.88 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p =.023). Correlations of 0.574, 0.488, and 0.686 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p <.001). No differences in HU based on sex, age, height, weight, or ethnicity were observed. Multivariate regression models demonstrated R2 values of 0.770 - 0.790 (p <.001) in prediction of LHU. CONCLUSIONS: Hounsfield Unit measurements derived from the cervical and thoracic spine correlate with the validated lumbar Hounsfield Unit. Hounsfield Unit measurements do not vary based on sex, ethnicity, age, height, or weight.

Longitudinal Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in Women Living With and Without HIV Across Reproductive Phases.

BACKGROUND: Women living with HIV commonly experience low areal bone mineral density (BMD), but whether this is affected by low ovarian hormonal states (prolonged amenorrhea or menopause) is unknown. We compared rates of BMD loss between women living with HIV and HIV-negative control women and investigated its association with low ovarian hormonal states. SETTING: Women living with HIV were enrolled from Vancouver Canada and controls from 9 Canadian sites. METHODS: This longitudinal analysis included age-matched women living with HIV in the Children and Women: AntiRetrovirals and Markers of Aging cohort and controls in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Rate of change/year in BMD at the total hip and lumbar spine (L1-L4) between 3 and 5 years was compared between groups, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Ninety-two women living with HIV (median [interquartile range] age: 49.5 [41.6-54.1] years and body mass index: 24.1 [20.7-30.8] kg/m 2 ) and 278 controls (age: 49.0 [43.0-55.0] years and body mass index: 25.8 [22.9-30.6] kg/m 2 ) were included. Total hip BMD loss was associated with HIV (ß: -0.003 [95% CI: -0.006 to -0.0001] g/cm 2 /yr), menopause (ß: -0.007 [-0.01 to -0.005] g/cm 2 /yr), and smoking (ß: -0.003 [-0.006 to -0.0002] g/cm 2 /yr); BMD gain was linked with higher body mass index (ß: 0.0002 [0.0007-0.0004] g/cm 2 /yr). Menopause was associated with losing L1-L4 BMD (ß: -0.01 [-0.01 to -0.006] g/cm 2 /yr). Amenorrhea was not associated with BMD loss. CONCLUSIONS: HIV and menopause negatively influenced total hip BMD. These data suggest women living with HIV require hip BMD monitoring as they age.

Auto-CA: Automated Cobb Angle Measurement Based on Vertebrae Detection for Assessment of Spinal Curvature Deformity.

An accurate identification and localization of vertebrae in X-ray images can assist doctors in measuring Cobb angles for treating patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It is useful for clinical decision support systems for diagnosis, surgery planning, and spinal health analysis. Currently, publicly available annotated datasets on spinal vertebrae are small, making deep-learning-based detection methods that are highly data-dependent less accurate. In this article, we propose an algorithm based on convolutional neural networks that can be trained to detect vertebrae from a small set of images. This method can display critical information on a patient's spine, display vertebrae and their labels on the thoracic and lumbar, calculate the Cobb angle, and evaluate the severity of spinal deformities. The proposed achieved an average accuracy of 0.958 and 0.962 for classifying spinal deformities (i.e., C-shaped, S-shaped type 1, and S-shaped type 2) and severity of Cobb angle (i.e., normal, mild, moderate, and severe), respectively. The Cobb angle measurement had a median difference of less than 5° from the ground-truth with SMAPE of 5.27% and an error on landmark detection of 19.73. In addition, Lenke classification is used to analyze spinal deformities as types A, B, and C, which have an average accuracy of 0.924. Physicians can use the proposed system in clinical practice by providing X-ray images via the user interface.

Semiautomatic Assessment of Facet Tropism From Lumbar Spine MRI Using Deep Learning: A Northern Finland Birth Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, population-based study that automatically measured the facet joint (FJ) angles from T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) of the lumbar spine using deep learning (DL). OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to introduce a semiautomatic framework that measures the FJ angles using DL and study facet tropism (FT) in a large Finnish population-based cohort. SUMMARY OF DATA: T2-weighted axial MRIs of the lumbar spine (L3/4 through L5/S1) for (n=1288) in the NFBC1966 Finnish population-based cohort were used for this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A DL model was developed and trained on 430 participants' MRI images. The authors computed FJ angles from the model's prediction for each level, that is, L3/4 through L5/S1, for the male and female subgroups. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability was analyzed for 60 participants using annotations made by two radiologists and a musculoskeletal researcher. With the developed method, we examined FT in the entire NFBC1966 cohort, adopting the literature definitions of FT thresholds at 7° and 10°. The rater agreement was evaluated both for the annotations and the FJ angles computed based on the annotations. FJ asymmetry ( - was used to evaluate the agreement and correlation between the raters. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement and systemic bias in the FJ asymmetry. The authors used the Dice score as the metric to compare the annotations between the raters. The authors evaluated the model predictions on the independent test set and compared them against the ground truth annotations. RESULTS: This model scored Dice (92.7±0.1) and intersection over union (87.1±0.2) aggregated across all the regions of interest, that is, vertebral body (VB), FJs, and posterior arch (PA). The mean FJ angles measured for the male and female subgroups were in agreement with the literature findings. Intrarater reliability was high, with a Dice score of VB (97.3), FJ (82.5), and PA (90.3). The inter-rater reliability was better between the radiologists with a Dice score of VB (96.4), FJ (75.5), and PA (85.8) than between the radiologists and the musculoskeletal researcher. The prevalence of FT was higher in the male subgroup, with L4/5 found to be the most affected region. CONCLUSION: The authors developed a DL-based framework that enabled us to study FT in a large cohort. Using the proposed method, the authors present the prevalence of FT in a Finnish population-based cohort.

Utility of MRI-based vertebral bone quality scores and CT-based Hounsfield unit values in vertebral bone mineral density assessment for patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

This study investigated bone mineral density assessment for patients with DISH. DXA-based T-scores overestimated bone quality, while MRI-based VBQ scores and CT-based HU values provided accurate assessments, particularly for advanced degenerative cases. This enhances accurate evaluation of BMD, crucial for clinical decision-making. PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic effectiveness of DXA, MRI, and CT in assessing bone mineral density (BMD) for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 105 DISH patients and 116 age-matched controls with lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted. BMD was evaluated using DXA-based T-scores, MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores, and CT-based Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Patients were categorized into three BMD subgroups. Lumbar osteophyte categories were determined by Mata score. Demographics, clinical data, T-scores, VBQ scores, and HU values were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified VBQ and HU thresholds for diagnosing normal BMD using DXA in controls. Correlations between VBQ, HU, and lumbar T-score were analyzed. RESULTS: Age, gender, and BMI showed no significant differences between DISH and control groups. DISH patients had higher T-score (L1-4), the lowest T-score, and Mata scores. VBQ and HU did not significantly differ between groups. In controls, VBQ and HU effectively diagnosed normal BMD (AUC = 0.857 and 0.910, respectively) with cutoffs of 3.0 for VBQ and 104.3 for HU. DISH had higher normal BMD prevalence using T-scores (69.5% vs. 58.6%, P < 0.05), but no significant differences using VBQ (57.1% vs. 56.2%, P > 0.05) and HU (58.1% vs. 57.8%, P > 0.05). Correlations revealed moderate correlations between HU and T-scores (L1-4) in DISH (r = 0.642, P < 0.001) and strong in controls (r = 0.846, P < 0.001). Moderate negative correlations were observed between VBQ and T-scores (L1-4) in DISH (r = - 0.450, P < 0.001) and strong in controls (r = - 0.813, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DXA-based T-scores may overestimate BMD in DISH. VBQ scores and HU values could effectively complement BMD assessment, particularly in DISH patients or those with advanced lumbar degeneration.

Reference values of lumbar spine range of motion by sex and age based on the assessment of supine trunk lateral bending-A preliminary study.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to clarify the preliminary reference values for the lumbar spine range of motion associated with lateral bending exercises by gender and age group. [Methods] Subjects were 82 volunteers without low back pain, including five males and five females in each age group from 16-19 to 80-89 years. All subjects underwent radiographs of the lumbar spine with lateral flexion; the range of lateral flexion of the vertebrae from T12 to the sacrum (ROLB) was measured twice by three observers. [Results] The ROLB of the entire T12-S1 of all subjects showed a significant negative correlation with age in both sexes (p < 0.01). The ROLB of the lumbar spine tended to be greater in females, with a statistically significant difference between those aged 16-19 and 70-79 (p < 0.05). Lateral flexion angles for each intervertebral segment were largest at L3-L4 and smallest at L5-S1 (0.7°). [Conclusion] Lumbar ROLB reference values were examined by gender and age group; ROLB was greatest in L3-L4, and ROLB tended to be lower in older age groups.

MRI-based radiomics assessment of the imminent new vertebral fracture after vertebral augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Imminent new vertebral fracture (NVF) is highly prevalent after vertebral augmentation (VA). An accurate assessment of the imminent risk of NVF could help to develop prompt treatment strategies. PURPOSE: To develop and validate predictive models that integrated the radiomic features and clinical risk factors based on machine learning algorithms to evaluate the imminent risk of NVF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 168 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with VA were evaluated. Radiomic features of L1 vertebrae based on lumbar T2-weighted images were obtained. Univariate and LASSO-regression analyses were applied to select the optimal features and construct radiomic signature. The radiomic signature and clinical signature were integrated to develop a predictive model by using machine learning algorithms including LR, RF, SVM, and XGBoost. Receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve analyses were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models. RESULTS: The radiomic-XGBoost model with the highest AUC of 0.93 of the training cohort and 0.9 of the test cohort among the machine learning algorithms. The combined-XGBoost model with the best performance with an AUC of 0.9 in the training cohort and 0.9 in the test cohort. The radiomic-XGBoost model and combined-XGBoost model achieved better performance to assess the imminent risk of NVF than that of the clinical risk factors alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Radiomic and machine learning modeling based on T2W images of preoperative lumbar MRI had an excellent ability to evaluate the imminent risk of NVF after VA.

Assessment of the correlation between mandibular radiomorphometric patterns and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements for screening bone mineral density.

The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between scores for femoral and lumbar spine bone mineral density (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) and visual, qualitative mandibular bone pattern assess¬ments (mandibular cortical index, trabecular bone pattern, and visual mandibular cortical width) as well as age and body mass index. Three trained observers evaluated 200 panoramic radiographs and 200 femoral and lumbar spine DXA measurements from 100 male and 100 female participants. The κ test showed an acceptable agreement among observers (0.73; P = 0.003). The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the variables were not normally distributed, so the Spearman correlation test was used. The mean age of the sample was 60.7 (13.9) years, and 86.0% of the patients were White. There were inverse correlations between the mandibular cortical index and the spine T-score in men, women, and the total sample as well as between the spine Z-score in the total sample. An inverse correlation was observed between the trabecular bone pattern and the spine T- and Z-scores in women and the total sample. The results also showed inverse correlations between the visual mandibular cortical width and all parameters analyzed in men, women, and the total sample except for the femur T-score and spine T- and Z-scores in men. Body mass index was correlated with all DXA parameters. Age was inversely correlated with femur T-scores in men and women but not with spine DXA values in men. The results suggest that qualitative assessments of radiomorphometric patterns on panoramic radiographs correlate with DXA values and therefore are suitable for screening patients at risk of developing low bone mineral density.

Variable flip angle T1 mapping and multi-echo T2 and T2* mapping magnetic resonance imaging sequences allow quantitative assessment of canine lumbar disc degeneration.

Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for diagnosing intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration in dogs. However, published methods for quantifying severity or progression of IVD degeneration are currently limited. Mapping MRI sequences are used in humans for quantifying IVD degeneration but have rarely been applied in dogs. The objective of this prospective, method comparison study was to evaluate variable flip angle T1 mapping and multiecho T2 and T2* mapping as methods for quantifying canine lumbar IVD degeneration in twenty canine patients without clinical signs of spinal disease. Ventral and dorsal lumbar IVD widths were measured on radiographs, and lumbar IVDs were assigned a qualitative Pfirrmann grade based on standard T2-weighted sequences. T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times of the nucleus pulposus (NP) were measured on corresponding maps using manual-drawn ROIs. Strong intra- and interrater agreements were found (P < 0.01) for NP relaxation times. Radiographic IVD widths and T1, T2, and T2* mapping NP relaxation times were negatively correlated with Pfirrmann grading (P < 0.01). Significant differences in T1 NP relaxation times were found between Pfirrmann grade I and the other grades (P < 0.01). Significant differences in T2 and T2* NP relaxation times were found between grade I and the other grades and between grades II and III (P < 0.01). Findings indicated that T1, T2, and T2* MRI mapping sequences are feasible in dogs. Measured NP relaxation times were repeatable and decreased when Pfirrmann grades increased. These methods may be useful for quantifying the effects of regenerative treatment interventions in future longitudinal studies.

Retrospective single-surgeon study of prone versus lateral robotic pedicle screw placement: a CT-based assessment of accuracy.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion including anterior-to-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion has conventionally relied on pedicle screw placement (PSP) for construct stabilization. Single-position surgery with lumbar interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position with concomitant PSP has been associated with increased operative efficiency. What remains unclear is the accuracy of PSP with robotic guidance when compared with the more familiar prone patient positioning. The present study aimed to compare robot-assisted screw placement accuracy between patients with instrumentation placed in the prone and lateral positions. METHODS: The authors identified all consecutive patients treated with interbody fusion and PSP in the prone or lateral position by a single surgeon between January 2019 and October 2022. All pedicle screws placed were analyzed using CT scans to determine appropriate positioning according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification grading system (grade C or worse was considered as a radiographically significant breach). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of a radiographically significant breach. RESULTS: Eighty-nine consecutive patients (690 screws) were included, of whom 46 (477 screws) were treated in the prone position and 43 (213 screws) in the lateral decubitus position. There were fewer breaches in the prone (n = 13, 2.7%) than the lateral decubitus (n = 15, 7.0%) group (p = 0.012). Nine (1.9%) radiographically significant breaches occurred in the prone group compared with 10 (4.7%) in the lateral decubitus group (p = 0.019), for a prone versus lateral decubitus PSP accuracy rate of 98.1% versus 95.3%. There were no significant differences in BMI between prone versus lateral decubitus cohorts (30.1 vs 29.6) or patients with screw breach versus those without (31.2 vs 29.5). In multivariate models, the prone position was the only significant protective factor for screw accuracy; no other significant risk factors for screw breach were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that pedicle screws placed with robotic assistance have higher placement accuracy in the prone position. Further studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of PSP in the lateral position as single-position surgery becomes more commonplace in the treatment of spinal disorders.

An effectiveness and economic analyses of tricalcium phosphate combined with iliac bone graft versus RhBMP-2 in single-level XLIF surgery in Thailand.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To perform effectiveness and economic analyses using data from a retrospective study of patients who underwent XLIF surgery using tricalcium phosphate combined with iliac bone graft (TCP + IBG) or BMP-2 in Thailand. METHODS: Data were collected from retrospective review of the medical charts and the spine registry of Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The patients were divided into two groups (TCP + IBG group and BMP-2 group). Demographic, perioperative data, radiographic, clinical results, and quality of life related to health were collected and analyzed at 2-year follow-up. All economic data were collected during the perioperative period and presented as total charge, bone graft, implant/instrumentation, operative service, surgical supply, transfusion, medication, anesthesia, laboratory, and physical therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-five TCP + IBG and 30 BMP-2 patients with spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis as primary diagnosis were included. There were no significant differences in all demographic parameters (gender, age, underlying disease, diagnosis, and level of spine) between these two groups. During the perioperative period, the TCP + IBG group had more mean blood loss and more postoperative complications compared to the BMP-2 group. At 2 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the TCP + IBG and BMP-2 groups. The fusion rate for TCP + IBG and BMP-2 at 2 years of follow-up was 80% and 96.7%, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were observed. All clinical outcomes (Utility, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) at 2-year follow-up improved significantly compared to preoperative outcomes, but there were no significant differences between the TCP + IBG and BMP-2 groups, either at preoperatively or at 2-year follow-up. The total charge of TCP + IBG was statistically significantly lower than that of BMP-2. Furthermore, the charges of TCP + IBG and BMP-2 during the perioperative period in Thailand were up to three times less than those in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Using TCP + IBG as a standalone bone substitution for XLIF surgery with additional posterior instrumentation resulted in significantly lower direct medical charge compared to those using BMP-2 in the perioperative period. However, we could not detect a difference in the long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with TCP + IBG and BMP-2. These suggest that TCP + IBG may be a valuable alterative bone graft, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Effect of the preoperative assessment of the anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal and dural area on the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of lumbar spinal stenosis by assessing the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter and dural area, determine the sensitivity of the anterior and posterior spinal canal diameter, dural area and dural occupying rate in predicting the postoperative efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for patients with single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis, and identify the corresponding indicators suggesting that OLIF surgery should not be performed. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of patients who had previously undergone OLIF surgery in our hospital, we included a total of 104 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had previously undergone single-stage surgery in our hospital. Three independent observers were employed to measure the anterior and posterior diameter of the spinal canal (AD, mm), dural area (CSA, mm2), the spinal canal area (SCA, mm2), and the ratio of the dural area to the spinal canal area (DM, %) at the disc level with the most severe stenosis on MRI. According to the values of AD and CSA in preoperative MRI, patients were divided into three groups: A, B, and C (Group A: AD > 12 and 100 < CSA ≤ 130, group B: Except A and C, group C: AD ≤ 10 and CSA ≤ 75). Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score, VAS score, modified Macnab standard) of 104 patients were statistically. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative clinical correlation scores among the mild, moderate and severe lumbar spinal stenosis groups. The improvement rate of the post treatment JOA score, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard were compared pairwise. There was no statistical significance in the improvement rate of the post treatment JOA score, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard between Group A and Group B (P = 0.125, P = 0.620, P = 0.803). There were statistically significant differences between Group A and Group C and between Group B and Group C in the improvement rate of the JOA score, the difference in the pre- and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard. The anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter and dural area are sensitive predictors of the postoperative efficacy of OLIF surgery for single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis. Moreover, when the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter was less than 6.545 mm and the dural area was less than 34.43 mm2, the postoperative effect of OLIF surgery was poor. CONCLUSIONS: All the patients with mild, moderate, and severe lumbar spinal stenosis achieved curative effects after OLIF surgery. Patients with mild and moderate lumbar spinal stenosis had better curative effects, and there was no significant difference between them, while patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis had poor curative effects. Both the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal and the dural area of the spinal canal were sensitive in predicting the curative effect of OLIF surgery for single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis. When the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter was less than 6.545 mm and the dural area was less than 34.43 mm2, the postoperative effect of OLIF surgery was poor.

What is the role of CT-based Hounsfield unit assessment in the evaluation of bone mineral density in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative spinal pathologies? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Computed tomography-based vertebral attenuation values (CT-based HU) have been shown to correlate with T-scores on DEXA scan; and have been acknowledged as an independent factor for predicting fragility fractures. Most patients undergoing lumbar surgeries require CT as part of their preoperative evaluation. PURPOSE: The current study was thus planned to evaluate the role of lumbar CT as an opportunistic investigation in determining BMD preoperatively in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients older than 45 years, who underwent one- to two-level lumbar (L3-S1 levels) fusions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the quantitative assessment of osteoporosis using Hounsfield Units (HU) on CT (L1-L5) and mean lumbar T-scores on DEXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry). HYPOTHESIS: HU on CT is comparable to T-score on DEXA as a suitable modality for the assessment of osteoporosis in patients undergoing one- to two-level lumbar fusion. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted between January and December 2021. Patients older than 45 years, who underwent one- to two-level lumbar (L3-S1 levels) fusions and had complete clinico-radiological records, were prospectively enrolled. A comparison was drawn between the HU (measured by placing an oval region of interest [ROI] over axial, sagittal and coronal images of lumbar vertebrae) on CT and T-scores on DEXA, and analyzed statistically. The HU values correlating best with normal (group A), osteopenia (B) and osteoporosis (C) categories (classified based on T-scores of lumbar spines) were determined statistically. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients (mean age of 60.56±11.63 years; 63 [72.4%] female patients) were prospectively studied. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean age (p=.01) and sex distribution (predominantly female patients; p=.03) of patients belonging to groups B (osteopenic) and C (osteoporotic patients), as compared with group A. The greatest correlation between T-score (on DEXA) and HU (on CT) for differentiating osteopenia (group B) from group A was observed at levels L1 (p<.001), L2 (p<.001) and L3 (p<.001). Based on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the cut-off values for HU for identifying osteopenia were 159 (at L1; sensitivity 81.6 and specificity 80) and 162 (at L2; sensitivity 80 and specificity 71.1). In addition, there was statistically significant correlation between T-score (on DEXA) and HU at all the lumbar levels for distinguishing osteoporosis (group C), although the difference was most evident at the upper lumbar (L1 and L2) levels (p<.001). Based on ROC analysis, cut-off HU values for defining osteoporosis were 127 (at L1; sensitivity 71.3 and specificity 70) and 117 (at L2; sensitivity 65.5 and specificity 90). CONCLUSION: Based on our study, the measurement of HU on CT at upper lumbar levels can be considered as "surrogate marker" for BMD in the diagnosis of osteopenia (cut-off: 159 at L1, 162 at L2) and osteoporosis (cut-off: 127 at L1, 117 at L2) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgeries. The HU measurements on CT at the lower lumbar levels (L4 and L5) are less reliable in this preoperative scenario.

The anatomical positioning change of retroperitoneal organs in prone and lateral position: an assessment for single-prone position lateral lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE: There are reports that performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in a prone, single position (single-prone LLIF) can be done safely in the prone position because the retroperitoneal organs reflect anteriorly with gravity. However, only a few study has investigated the safety of single-prone LLIF and retroperitoneal organ positioning in the prone position. We aimed to investigate the positioning of retroperitoneal organs in the prone position and evaluate the safety of single-prone LLIF surgery. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical positioning of the retroperitoneal organs was evaluated by CT in the preoperative supine and intraoperative prone position. The distances from the centre line of the intervertebral body to the organs including aorta, inferior vena cava, ascending and descending colons, and bilateral kidneys were measured for the lumbar spine. An "at risk" zone was defined as distance less than 10 mm anterior from the centre line of the intervertebral body. RESULTS: Compared to supine preoperative CTs, bilateral kidneys at the L2/3 level as well as the bilateral colons at the L3/4 level had statistically significant ventral shift with prone positioning. The proportion of retroperitoneal organs within the at-risk zone ranged from 29.6 to 88.6% in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal organs shifted ventrally with prone positioning. However, the amount of shift was not large enough to avoid risk for organ injuries and substantial proportion of patients had organs within the cage insertion corridor. Careful preoperative planning is warranted when considering single-prone LLIF.

Biomechanical modeling and assessment of lumbar vertebral body tethering configurations.

PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless spinal growth modulation technique, which shows promise for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curve correction. This technique, mainly used for thoracic curves, is increasingly being used to treat lumbar curves in order to preserve spine flexibility. It remains necessary to adequately define the cord tension to be applied during the operation and the instrumented levels to biomechanically predict correction over time for the lumbar spine. METHODS: Twelve pediatric patients with lumbar IS, treated with lumbar-only or lumbar and thoracic VBT, were selected for this study. Three independent variables were tested alternately using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM), which includes an algorithm modeling vertebra growth and spine curve changes due to growth modulation for 24 months post-operatively according to the Hueter-Volkmann principle. Parameters included cable tensioning (150N/250N), upper instrumented level (actual UIV, UIV-1) and lower instrumented level (actual LIV, LIV + 1). Each FEM was personalized using 3D radiographic reconstruction and flexibility supine radiographs. RESULT: An increase in cord tension (from 150 to 250N) had significant effects on main thoracic and thoraco-lumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, as well as on lumbar lordosis, after surgery (supplementary average correction of 3° and 8°, and increase of 1.4°, respectively) and after 24 months (4°, 10° and 1.1°) (p < 0.05). Adding a level to the actual UIV or LIV did not improve correction. CONCLUSION: This parametric study showed that cord tension is the most important biomechanical parameter on the simulated immediate and 2-year increase in lumbar curve correction. Our preliminary model suggests that it is not advantageous to add additional instrumented levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This computational study uses a retrospective validation cohort (level of evidence 3).

Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar interbody cage subsidence has a multifactorial etiology. Cage material, although well studied after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, has not been investigated as a contributing factor to subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). In this study the authors compared rates of subsidence and reoperation after LLIF between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 3D-printed porous titanium (pTi) in an institutional propensity score-matched and cost analysis. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort analysis of adult patients who underwent LLIF with pTi versus PEEK between 2016 and 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were collected. Propensity scores were calculated and 1:1 matching without replacement of surgically treated levels was performed. The primary outcome of interest was subsidence. The Marchi subsidence grade was determined at the time of last follow-up. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare subsidence and reoperation rates between lumbar levels treated with PEEK versus pTi. Modeling and cost analysis were performed using TreeAge Pro Healthcare. RESULTS: The authors identified a total of 192 patients; 137 underwent LLIF with PEEK (212 levels) and 55 had LLIF with pTi (97 levels). After propensity score matching, a total of 97 lumbar levels remained in each treatment group. After matching, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics. Levels treated with pTi were significantly less likely to exhibit subsidence (any grade) compared to those treated with PEEK (8% vs 27%, p = 0.001). Five (5.2%) levels treated with PEEK required reoperation for subsidence, but only 1 (1.0%) level treated with pTi required reoperation for subsidence (p = 0.12). Given subsidence and revision rates experienced in the cohorts in this study, the pTi interbody device is economically superior to PEEK in a single-level LLIF as long as its cost is at least $1185.94 lower than that of PEEK. CONCLUSIONS: The pTi interbody device was associated with less subsidence, but statistically similar revision rates after LLIF. pTi is potentially a superior economic choice at this study's reported revision rate.